Dear Ms. Parker:
In our universe, a far time ago, you wrote ab op-ed blasting the idea of research which could allow babies to be carried to the full 9-months in a womb within a male. Yes. You blasted the idea. Are you aware of sea horse males carrying babies to term and then delivering them?
So, what do you think about the fact that sea horse males get the eggs of a female put inside the male body (how? I have no idea) after a ritual fertilization dance? Interesting.
I bring this up, not only to be contentious with you about males carrying babies, but for other reasons, too.
A person who was once near and dear to me made a claim that “God made a mistake by creating sea horses in this manner.” Oh my goodness! God made a mistake? To which my reply is, only the pope makes mistakes, not God. You know. Many o believe the pope is NOT infallible. Our ancestors who believe this came to the shores of America to escape the fascist type persecution by Roman Catholics which was drawn from one of the most brutal and barbaric regimes in civilization, from the Roman Empire through the Holy Roman Empire and the barbaric inquisitions against the Protestant Huguenots and into the persecution of the Jews in Germany, Italy, and other parts of Europe. One such family came to these shores after those who were in the 17th Century clergy class of Britain who wrote a treatise critical of the idea that the pope is infallible. God does not make mistakes. Human beings do.
Recently, at the New York State Fair, we viewed the livestock exhibits. We learned that, with artificial insemination, the males were no longer necessary. That is the reason for obtaining veal. Male calves put to death for food. For us, we refuse to purchase veal. Sadly, will this spare the lives of male calves? Don’t know. Humans make mistakes, not God.
We also have heard of no necessity for male chickens because it is the females which lay the eggs and, like a human harem during days gone by, there is less need for males, so the little chick roosters are put to death. How? I have heard they are ground up alive. Humans make mistakes, not God.
Did God make a mistake by creating bees? The males impregnate the queen bee and then are killed by stinging death of the female worker bees in the hive. So the males get to use their penis and then… wam bam thank you ma’am … are killed. With stingers, so I am told.
So, when a person thinks God is bad for making the sea horses the way he does, I have to protest.
Thus, when Kathleen Parker describes her contention with using males to carry babies in a womb, I have to protest again.
Gay male couples do a fine job of adopting and raising children. Lesbians do the same. There is proof that such situations with same-sex couples who adopt babies and raise them sometimes do a better job than some heterosexual couples who are blessed by the bishops and priests of America. Some of them do a better job than heterosexual couples. So what is the problem with the freaking Roman Catholic bishops of America who take offense and give judgments that belong with God, not human beings, regarding masturbation, prostitution (going uncontrolled rather than being regulated and taxed, as in Europe), same-sex marriage, abortion, contraception, and sex outside of marriage? My grandmother always quoted the Gospels with, “don’t judge, lest you be judged.” Pointing a human finger of judgment at other human beings means there are three fingers pointing back at an individual. Perhaps if males carry babies, there might be less incest and rape which cause abortions. But silly me for thinking in such a humane manner.
Paul quotes Leviticus with regard to gay men. The reason the scripture exists in Leviticus is due to the lack of males to impregnate females. The reason why Paul used the scripture was to stop the pagan rituals which were sex-oriented. It had no relation to the original scripture because the pagan sex rituals involved females and males, as well as homosexuality. Take a testosterone-laden barbaric male who loves to screw women as much as possible to think of some way to be barbaric and mean to gay men, and they can find something in the Bible. Then establish this traditionalist belief over centuries, backed up by the Holy Roman Empire (barbaric with inquisitions) and VOILA! We have people judging one another, as if they are God, when they are not.
There are several on the Supreme Court who are Roman Catholics and some opposed to abortion and same-sex marriage. Apparently the guys there think with their brains in their penis. The one who once told me “God makes a mistake with sea horses,” also made that statement about males. Which is why this all bothers me. So, what about the female Roman Catholic on the bench, just like the one who got all mixed up about sea horses? Is the brain of those women in their cunts? ‘Splain it to me, Lucy.
Many such people want to tolerate rape and incest, but take offense at someone being gay or having an abortion. Give me a break because such people do nothing but invoke a dictatorship of THEIR beliefs and do so in a land which has something in the constitution which says there is a freedom of religion. The Roman Catholics on this SCOTUS are representing a minority of Americans but are a majority on the SCOTUS. They love to create a hell on earth, unless those who don’t agree with their religious beliefs are executed, as Hitler, a non-devout Roman Catholic, did to Jews in Europe. As the barbaric Holy Roman Empire did to my Protestant Huguenot ancestors in France and other places in Europe . Barbarism of the Roman kind has been described as the most brutal in civilization. They were sickos. Who would get a thrill and a pleasure from throwing Christians to the lions in an arena? The Romans. Damn the ones in Italy today who are pushing fascism there. Damn those who want a one-party state with a hidden agenda of fascism, whether that be Florida or England. Damn them all for creating a hell on earth.
No, Ms. Parker, there is nothing wrong with research to impregnate a male, using his sperm and the eggs of another, so the male can carry the fetus to full term and then give birth. Rather than killing off males as being of no value to the world, as the worker bees in a hive do, perhaps we can recognize the value of ALL human beings and stop the BS of hell on earth.
Tioga Herald 
Capitalist Supply & Demand & I Won’t Back Down From Demanding the DEMAND Side with Newspapers
Speaking to people in defense of keeping print copies of newspapers available, I have made a pretty good case in defense of the DEMAND SIDE of the market which has been deliberately curtailed by big fat pigs at the top with a love for money narcissistic and self-centered attitude who simply wish to line their pockets with a USA Today approach like Pravda of Moscow and not considering other aspects about how they can make money with PRINT copies of newspapers. They DELIBERATELY began to remove the one unique thing which sold newspapers and kept circulation numbers up. I have been validated with reports from the broadcast media and other sources. These are not just NEWSpapers, but local NEWS & INFORMATION papers. These are UNIQUE to local newspapers as the Mustang is to the Ford Corporation. Would Ford DELIBERATELY get rid of a product which is unique and put in place something which like USA Today and tell all the local people to go to hell and just read USA Today online.
Because that is what is being shoved down the faces of the demand side of what is SUPPOSED to be a truly capitalist market (not supply side Reaganomics which is NOT capitalism and almost as bad as centrally-controlled government of communists in the Soviet Union) the ultimate result is a destruction of
All in this list plus MORE than what is in this list. The news & INFORMATION, not spread all over so as to search with a lousy Google search engine.
When the demand side of capitalism answers the way the big fat pigs with mansions hope they would do – stop reading the new versions of what are called local newspapers, they stop reading and search other sources where they are not TAUGHT but just look for what is in agreement. Yippee! Then the fat pigs of supply-side newspaper industry Reaganomics can say, “look —— NO ONE IS READING NEWSPAPERS!” Bullshit. When you take away the sections and parts which sold newspapers, no one WANTS to read them. No surprise. The fat pigs are doing this to the newspaper industry so they can fill their GODDAMN pockets more than others and don’t have to figure out a way to lower overhead or other means. Ask me. I have a few suggestions for lowering overhead. But these bastard pigs modeled after Putin refuse to listen.
How many times do I get dildo heads who stand up for this supply-side Reaganomics? All the time. And I get insulted by such people. Those who are wealthier than the rest of us simply defending the wealthy and using facts about how circulation has declined. Of course it has declined. When the content is condensed, why would it not decline? Even if The New York Times DOES NOT condense its content, people are NOT being taught to read to learn, but to read to be entertained, as a result of those newspapers which DO condense the LOCAL news. Besides, The New York Times is not just local but is a better national style news than any of the others, especially on Sundays. They might have a large market of digital-loving bastards who want technology for the sake of change. But they don’t take into account the ones who don’t want to go to the trouble and expense of maintaining the freaking technology which is like a little baby, needing constant attention and resources. The New York Times in print and all we have to do is sit down and read it, not spend most of our time trying to figure out a technology and Internet which is very low quality and lacks any intuitive ways because computers and the ones providing such to the consumers are stupid. And with gray hard-to-read lettering and really lousy brightness, besides the size of the print, one has to try to face a technology which sucks because it lacks any intuitive ways about it. Setting up device XYZ12334555. Or IP SHOCHOIJS10320kpf;jsakljoip. What the hell is all that supposed to mean to consumers? Go f yourselves with that bullshit, especially for those of us who are visually impaired and have one more impediment to it all and no one willing to service and maintain such device on the Internet and on a regular basis. More people are scammers out there with their hacking and sniper-based cowardly way just to see how well they can trip up the demand side of the market. This is a barbaric picture of people who don’t give ONE DAMN about one another in America. They don’t CARE and simply scoff at those of us who complain. Or ask, “are you ok?” At the time we complain. YES. I AM OK. IT IS THE GODDAMN non-human devices which are NOT OK and the fat pigs who push their national news on us in digital form and with no concern about the demand side of the market because they could no longer earn their GODDAMN money by sitting on their buttes in a lazy fashion.
My newsprint costs
My technology costs
Digital itself costs almost four times as much. Almost 2/3 more for the digital. Add to that the additional times for buffering which is comparable to a 1950s vacuum tube television startup time, plus other problems which are CONSTANT, not just isolated – some est. to be from sniping types of hackers who are nothing but cowards and don’t get stopped by law enforcement which might be more interested in treating those in the black community in a lousy manner.
Meanwhile, the consumers are being screwed. Some behind the cash register complain in stupidity about the price of $6.00 for a newspaper. Look at these costs and compare these costs outlined above.
And the insulting of me for complaining about being FORCED into reading digitally. No concern for fellow human beings, but just thinking from their own narrow perspective of life: me, me, me, and that’s all. One who states, with blinders on, “her perspective,” knows more about the lack of readers of newspapers than I do who can outline a very wide perspective about this isse, but get insulted instead.
Others with wealth who insult me. Perhaps favoring the legal system. Perhaps defending the system to which one works with technology and wants technology for the sake of change (me, me, me) and does not wish to acknowledge those of us who find CONSTANT and CONTINUOUS problems and expenses of technology and are not WEALTHY enough to spend the money nor the time resources on this, preferring reading the newsprint instead. We are insulted by such people who call themselves Americans. But if they think they are friends, who needs enemies? We would ask for assistance, but the ball is still in our court unless such people live with us. Not sure such people wish to do that. Narcissistic money-loving self-centered asses who don’t give one damn about their fellow human beings. Freak such people with narrow perspectives and blinders.
Local news broadcasts in one-half hour? Great for some small minded people who don’t want to learn what is going on. How many items in the list of local news and information entities above.
There are solutions to this so as to make this a consideration of true capitalist supply AND demand, but no one wishes to consider anything but freaking lousy ideologies with the spinning of a false sense of what capitalism is about by anti-communist jerks on the supply-side Reaganomics fat pigs at the top.
Solutions:
The problem with such solutions? The fat pigs don’t care whether they can lower overhead, just to fill their pockets in easy ways and without having to deal with overhead. They don’t earn money the old fashioned way because they expect to take money in any way possible, like a Trumpster who needs to be in a dumpster and carried away.
The demand-side consumers will purchase the newspapers, should the local content not be condensed in such manner as what has happened want a source of local news AND information which brings local news and information in ONE SPOT, not sprawled all over the Internet and a search engine. It is also easier to go through the white pages of a phone directory, rather than the stupidity of search engines which are designed to pull names and addresses of those who are wealthy and pay at the beginning of a search result list. Again. Based on freaking lousy supply-side Reaganomics, not true supply and demand capitalism. If someone objects to my pointing out true capitalism of supply and demand are lousy humans who likely prefer centralized communism or any anti-capitalist idea beneficial to wealthy pigs. They are stupid people.
I will continue to be adamant and stand my ground against any form of supply-side Reaganomics which is truly Hitler-style business which we don’t need in America. I will not tolerate insults from stupid and sometimes wealthy people who don’t give a damn about my own desires which make my life happy, as well as the lives of countless others. So, Gannett, you can screw in your laziness to eliminate print copy deliveries. I have offered to help deliver newspapers from another newspaper, as they advertised the need for delivery persons. I have YET to hear back, so they can all go screw themselves, as well as those who insult me by DICTATING what we Americans SHOULD be receiving in digital. Go screw and go to h-e-double hockey sticks – by putting them where the sun don’t shine – and that might be in a coffin. How dare people insult me. How dare they do that to provoke anger, mockery, and taunting. This is my country, too, and I demand the freedoms we have with SUPPLY AND DEMAND capitalist considerations. I am serious about this and find no one to have proof that we MUST have digital. You have no proof, except the words of money-loving narcissists only.
Category:
Commentary, Economics, Regulated Capitalism, Commerce, Information Industry, Journalism & Media, Living & Learning Moment, Mister Doug Notes, Personal Finance, Technology
Leave a comment
Tagged with: