Don’t Knock It Completely
I have been hearing in the media the reasons why the Trumpty Dumpty tariffs are not working for the community. What Americans don’t know and what the Democrats are not TEACHING America is how the tariffs imposed by the early U.S. government administrations was to support the development of industries within the USA. As a fledgling nation, we had little commerce within the nation, so tariffs could put a higher price on products imported while bolstering product development within the nation.
The Trumpty Dumpty regime does not even have an understanding of what a tariff is about. Instead they target our enemies and products from nations like China. WRONG. It is so haphazard, and then with the attacks on Iran, that it is all blowing up in our American faces while the Chinese are making out quite well. There have been American-Asian people who have proposed how we can beat the Chinese which have been projected as taking a world leadership role.
The Democrats had a better grip on what these Asian-Americans have said. Trumpty Dumpty regime demonstrates how stupid it is and has the lemmings (its base) following the “pied piper” over a cliff in which all America can suffer. Selective tariffs and all America suffer.
In effect, a tariff is a value-added tax (VAT). VAT is used in Europe. But the tariff is a VAT on imported goods. We could place an ACROSS THE BOARD VAT on domestic goods, too. Thus, rid us of the damn income tax which is a regressive tax punishing entrepreneurs who know how to develop this nation. The Democrats like Kamala Harris made a mistake in not challenging Trumpty Dumpty with a better version of VAT which would include a higher VAT on imported goods, so as to balance our American economy and improve the American GNP. Instead, the Democrats sliced the word tariff from stem to stern and never brought up the haphazard way Trumpty Dumpty regime was using it.
For me, I do not oppose the tariff as part of a VAT system. But I find the Trumpty Dumpty regime to be stupid in its application of it, as Trumpty Dumpty is stupid and chaotic and all other things, too.
Apparently, there are those who think they are experts and say that “tariff is not a VAT.” Wrong. You add value in the form of a tax to imported products, right? Then a tariff is a FORM of a VAT. PERIOD. I don’t wish to argue that with an expert who is actually a “drip under pressure.” A VAT can be a tax added to domestic products OR on imported products. It is a tax added to PRODUCTS. PERIOD. You want to make it as complex as the stupidity of a complex income tax system, a regressive tax, then go ahead and make it that way. Go ahead and make the U.S. Code a thicker volume with complexity of freaking lousy experts who are “drips under pressure.” Lawyers and accountants and others who think they are experts by writing complexity into the U.S. Code. For me, I am fed up and sick and tired of this complexity, hoping we can simply make one VAT across the board and differentiated ONLY by domestic and import products. Imported product VAT with a higher “value” tax than for domestic. KISS, and not kiss the asses of certain people who want tax this way or that for their own egotistical bullshit reasons and benefit to the selfish self. We are America, a nation of many people, not in selective groups to be catered to and make some happier than others so the bastards can be the only ones who become billionaires and run a dictatorial autocratic oligarchy.
It is sad that I can find no one who takes this perspective on this. So, the complexity and confusion begins. The Man-baby has no idea what it all means. The only benefit seen from his freaking lousy perspective is for the billionaires perspective. And the Democrats are just as stupid. They only look at this from the consumer perspective and come out with an inaccurate assessment. “Tax the rich.” That was how we ended up with the lousy fucking income tax. The income tax code originally took up one page of a newspaper. Today it is written in volumes so as to make benefits for all the myriads of stupid groups in America. We go back and forth with the Robin Hood theory to tax the wealthy at a higher rate. The billionaires then come back to the stupid Citizens United crap which is really nothing but Billionaires United crap. And what happens with this Billionaires United shit regarding the income tax? The REVERSE Robin Hood theory. In comes Trumpty Dumpty who does not know shit about any of this, is portrayed as some “white knight” to save the world and the bastard does not even have the foggiest notion about what he is doing with the tariff.
Once again. KISS. And stop kissing the asses of the billionaire group or the opposite side of the class distinctions. Stop kissing the asses of separate groups, offer H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt and other tax specialists the opportunity to run a VAT for domestic and imported products and stop this damn BULLSHIT we have today. As Warren Buffett said, re-write the U.S Code in a much smaller size rather than the tomes which now exist (to put his statement in a nutshell).
And fuck the Man-baby who only knows how to DESTROY, not re-write and reform it. The Man-baby is an ass-wipe and I determined this a long time ago, back to the 1980s. My perspective on the asswipe Man-baby is NOT based on politics, either, as the paranoid jerk seems to think he faces. He has always been a bigoted prejudiced homophobic asswipe as long as his face has been in the media. I have had enough of his asswipe face in the media.
I hate to end this writing with such a vulgar sour note. But how long do Americans have to put up with the American Fascist Party (aka present-day Republicans) who say, “their way or the highway?” When will decent Republicans who know the foundation of the party with Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Nelson Rockefeller, Everett Dirksen, and others? Decent Americans with a broader perspective on human lives in America, even if you are some asswipe who wants to find SOME imperfection in each one of these guys. I am sick and tired of finding ONE or TWO things wrong. That would also apply to Democrats like Thomas Jefferson, FDR, JFK, RFK, Sr (not the fucking junior), Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. One single imperfection and each one is dead meat in the minds of too many lainbrained idiotic Americans who need an attitude adjustment about ideas of humans being PERFECT when we are not.

Town of Newark Valley proposition for appointments rather than election
Dear Editor:
The election is over. Based on preliminary results, I understand that the Newark Valley town proposition to change elections such as the Newark Valley Town Highway Superintendent to an appointed position by the town council was defeated. Prior to the election, I remained silent. Perhaps I should have spoken out because, once again, I observed that emotions from the loudest mouths who were opposed to such a change swayed the herd mentality so as to convince people to vote on the measure based on what angry people say with a loud mouth than to consider logic and reasoning of the situation. “Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”(A statement in a Star Trek movie by Mr. Spock character played by Leonard Nimoy, at the point Mr. Spock was about to die). How sad for Newark Valley. How sad for New York. How sad for the USA. Logic thrown out the window.
It is a shame that the ballots could not have contained information as to the REASONS behind the thought about changing it. As a result, only the loud mouths who blistered this notion were heard.
For instance,some of what I heard in the repetitive forces were as follows.
(1) “Political appointments remove the opportunity for the people to speak.”
(2) “Political appointments mean that those unqualified would be appointed, due to patronage.” (3) “Political appointments give opportunities for the ‘good old boy’ network to operate.”
Logic is thrown out the window in favor of false ideas about our life and politics. Let us take a closer look at this tripe.
Number 1. Political appointments remove the opportunity for the people to speak.
Really? In the election which just passed, I had no opportunity to speak through the ballot box. While I am not in disagreement with the person chosen, why was I not able to have a choice? Because I am a registered Democrat and the choices were made in a Republican primary. There are independent voters who don’t want to be affiliated with either political party. At times, I wish I were independent and it is frustrating that there are no Democratic Party primaries. Yet, a stupid Republican once called those of us here who are Democrats as “Dumicrats.” To that person, I could say Republidumbheads.” I can also think of a very nasty word for Republicans, but I won’t offer it. There are Green Party and Libertarians, etc., etc., etc.No such people are able to vote in a Republican primary. Where is the “voice of the people?” At least when someone is considered for appointment to an office, people may be given a chance to attend a town council meeting and voice approval. Otherwise, there is a segment of the population which is screwed.
In this case, perhaps Republicans would say the simple solution for me would have been to register as a Republican, right? So, let’s create a one-party state. Oh, that’s right. A one-party state in Newark Valley is not a new thing at all. In fact, I knew people who moved here as Democrats and, in order to become involved in the politics here, dumped their Democratic Party affiliation and became Republicans. Excuse me. But one-party states existed in Hitler’s Germany and the Bolsheviks and Marxist/communists of Russia and the Soviet Union.
One possible solution would be for New York State, rather than putting a stupid thing on the ballot about New York City judicial funding, put a proposition on the ballot to allow people to go to the polls on election day and simply declare one party as the designated party to vote in a primary. That would give more voices. I have heard of states which do this and have other similar processes as solutions to such a problem. I might add that in the state where I spent nearly 40 years, they do not have such a solution, but some people spoke up in favor of such solutions for primaries. But alas, Republicans of Florida don’t want people to vote and are putting forth adverse laws to restrict voting. Why would such a state even consider such when it works to discourage voters since the Republicans created a one-party state, beginning with Jeb Bush.
“Logic clearly dictates that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.”
Number 2. Political appointments mean that those unqualified would be appointed, due to patronage.
What about the unqualified who can run for a job and are not qualified to be highway superintendent, clerk, or what ever? What about the example of a relative of mine who was very qualified for an office, due to bookkeeping skills possessed by this person and appointed by both Republicans AND Democrats to a job? No patronage there. So it is possible, with the right people elected to leadership roles in the government councils and executive offices. Perhaps the “voice” of the people should spend more time investigating those who are elected into the town, village, city, or county councils of government. I don’t argue that it is not possible for the existence of patronage. I am sure it does happen all the time. But to cast a pessimistic aspersion on something which might be a good solution is absurd. With herd mentality spreading potentially false information is a stereotypical tarnishing of ideas.
Number 3. Political appointments give opportunities for the “good old boy network” to operate.
False. This statement is like taking offense of anything we do as humans with human institutions always results in a “godd old boy network.” Such networks exist, but there is proof that sometimes they do not exist. The man appointed to supervise operations of a village lawn, street, sidewalk maintenance and garbage collection service, with only an 8th grade education and not wealthy by any stretch of the imagination, might NOT be acceptable to accountants, lawyers, business people and others who are in positions of responsibility, but just might do a good job. One such example did exist one time. I do know a thing or two from history.
My mantra has become this. Human beings and human institutions cannot possibly be perfect. If people knew Christian values, they should realize this. Yet, how many people continue to consider humans or human institutions in whom they have a “beef” as not living up to expectations in terms of perfection. With the president prior to our current one, I spent time TRYING to find things which demonstrated a leader. In contrast to his paranoid views that “everyone was out to get him” in terms of a “witchhunt,” I knew a number of people who tried to turn around some of his bad. Each time I became disappointed. However, I did not hold an expectation of perfection when going into consideration of the man. On the same token, I can say the same about a former governor. There were some things I may have disagreed, but there also may have been some things I disagreed. I did not wish to tarnish his image ONLY on the things in which I disagreed. And this governor had some factors which were the same as the former president for whom the religious right swept under the rug.
Main point. Making appointments by the Newark Valley Town Council is not a bad idea when the village of Newark Valley haas been doing it for many years and has been successful in its endeavors. It was the people’s voice in the village which voted against a sewage system and natural gas lines within the village limits. It was the village which first introduced cable television to the area and regulated the cable television. It was the FCC, including many Republicans at a higher level, and other agencies which removed local control of cable television and endorsed the huge corporate conglomerates, through deregulation, which destroyed local business. It would behoove local people to take on these issues at the local level than to be concerned about whether or not we cannot possibly handle the appointment of positions within the town government. Ignorance, as opposed to stupidity, of the issue, without thinking and looking into details, which means such ignorance, with humility an open mind, would enable learning and wisdom. Critical thinking skills are very handy in such situations.
Category:
Commentary
Tagged with: