The intent of this blog is to promote human equality, human progress, human peace and justice, and optimism. To accomplish this, to encourage the discussion of ideas after identifying and discovering problems, and then creating positive solutions for "we the people," in order to provide for the "general welfare" and "domestic tranquility" of America now and its "posterity" into the future. To encourage an emphasis on separation of religion and state for all, no matter if this is for those "of faith" in a Maker / Creator (Deists, God-loving people, Christians, various people of spirituality) and atheists or agnostics.

Even with other problems, such as Ukraine, impacting America today, I urge you to vote in favor of thee U.S. Postal Service Reform Act.

In light of the 75-year advanced payment for U.S. Postal Service health benefits, estimates are that it costs the taxpayers some $27B. This is outrageous and needs to stop.

Also in light of this fact, ultimately this bill would remove such an investment and save the USPS an estimated $22.6B over 10 years.

This bill would also “well serve the USPS fundamental mission, by requiring it to continue delivering mail and packages six days a week.” For a consumer, I much prefer having a private mailbox than to force us to move to an Amazon confiugations of delivery to our personal home garage and such delivery people to have a remote key to our garage, as demonstrated in Amazon commercials. Some people don’t have garages and those of us who do do not want our privacy by way of waling to a mailbox to receive mail replaced by some companies access to our garage.

Our government keeps it private because it does answer to American citizens, as you, Representative Reed, need to answer to your constituents like me. How can we expect to trust big business to do the same thing? Who represents us on the Amazon or UPS or Fedex or Emory boards? Sleeping Ronnie in the the Cabinet was stupid in saying, “government is the problem.” It may be difficult for constituents NOW to speak out, but it’s better than the prospect of losing that means of doing so, as it is in Putin’s Russia which Republicans wish to impose such fascism upon us all. Thus with Sleeping Ronnie i the Cabinet and his deregulation and privatization since that time, we the people are losing out.

With this being said, the current Postal Regulatory Commission has regular “reporting requirements” for matters such as setting rates and other issues pertinent to the American public.

Again. I urge you to pass the USPS postal reform bill and stop the crap from Trump fascists in the Republican (to which I once belonged to the Republican Party) leadership who work to destroy, not reform. Thus, we can assure the long-term survival of the U.S. Postal Service.

At the same time, since only 25% of U.S. Postal Service employees join the benefits package paid by taxpayers, perhaps you should REFORM, not DESTROY Medicare, really lousy system implemented by Bush and the Republicans and one of the reasons I left the party. This system is set up with tiers, donut holes and “pre-existing” conditions in privatized Medicare supplement plans.

What I am discussing is health conditions covered AND PAID FOR WITH PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE, while employed, but going into retirement, we suddenly have to pay through the nose with six-months of premiums and risk not getting such conditions covered during the six-month period.

Put in place a single-payer user-financed universal healthcare plan with teeth to protect that money for healthcare of the individual based on a LONG-TERM investment and DIVIDENDS gained by such a capitalist notion.

Please don’t just reform Medicare by giving handouts to those of us who are senior citizens. Such handouts are typically figured on income and revenue stream, not the profit margin in a single family budget. Imagine giving out corporate welfare based on income and revenue stream, not profits. What is good for big business is good for we the people, is it not? After all, Citizens United identifies that corporate entities are like a human entity, does it not?

This is addressing the stupidity of Mr. AWOL George Bush who proclaimed that “what is good for business is good for America.” This statement also turned me off to the Republican Party so I sought something else in this democracy. What I say about big business and Mr. AWOL Bush defending it, speaks to big tobacco which Democratic Party Governor Lawton Chiles (Florida) and former U.S. Senator, worked to bring down due to the deaths to many people and society having to pay for such healthcare. But this statement also supports American drug lords and the lousy lawyers who defend them who don’t want to legalize what are called “illicit” drugs because they know it would not be “good for their business.” So, therefore, they have money to persuade lousy Baptists and other puritanical evangelicals to continue prohibition of those drugs which are now illicit, rather than the lower-cost alternative for society of working for rehab. Examples of the crap of Mr. AWOL Bush in his statement about business.

Side Note: Single-payer universal healthcare
On the topic of single-payer healthcare for all Americans, are you aware of the comparison of costs to the Canadian system, or do you cling to the lousy stupid attitudes of a fascist Republican leadership which bows down in reverence to the puritanical crap of America, and think it’s all about socialism. I just explained how there are matters involved in this question which are about capitalist long-term investments with dividends. Instead, the fascist Republican leadership also bows down to the likes of big insurance which does not want to maintain long-term benefits with dividends because it eats at the pockets of the big CEOs at the top, not the profit margins.

Read about 19th-Century Massachusetts Insurance Commissioner who found that money paid in premiums for whole-life life policies was being fragrantly spent by the CEOs of big insurance. Then at death, families of people holding such policies were told there was no money. Read all about it, in a book written by historian and professor, Dr. Daniel J. Boorstin. Dr. Boorstin was appointed to and served as Librarian of Congress. It was one of the better things that Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet did back in the 1980s, back at the time I was a registered Republican.

RE: Oakdale Mall / Commons (23 Feb. 2022). We lived in Palm Beach County. The Palm Beach Mall was failing. New Owners put in an outlet mall. The old mall was torn down, to build the new one. Don’t know the reasons why. But the new outlet mall is fantastic. Just something I offer.

The ideas for the Oakdale Commons sound great. Someone suggested a coffee shop. We love Starbucks. But a local bistro coffee / bistro with art exhibits would also be wonderful.

As a person who has to limit his diet, due to diabetes, one establishment we really enjoyed in South Florida was Golden Corral buffet. You can pay a lower price and pick and choose the foods you want, rather than choosing from an established, pre-determined menu with combinations of foods.

Unlike Chick-Fil-A, the CEO at Starbucks is gay friendly and does not condemn same-sex marriage. Not so with Chick-Fil-A. We would never go into Chick-Fil-A. Shame on people who would go just to snub their nose at those of us who stand up for human rights and believe we don’t go “because we don’t like the food.” We never said we did not like the food. The question is about the treatment of human beings. Make the commons for the community, not just to satisfy those who want to push the LGBTQ+ back into a closet and keep us segregated.

One more thing. The idea of including health and wellness services in the commons is also wonderful. Another option similar to this is considering spaces where community college students training to be dental hygienists, dental assistants, cosmetologists, masseuses, and other vocations, could work with patients, under the supervision of instructors. They would clean teeth or do other functions in which they are being trained to do. This idea is taken from the old Sunshine Mall in Fort Pierce, FL, where Indian River State College had similar health offices just for the purposes I describe.

Best wishes to the new ownership of the Oakdale Commons!

Electoral College and third-party presidential candidates. Dateline 1912. Candidates for president. Democrat Woodrow Wilson, a native southerner living in New Jersey; employed at Princeton U. . Howard Taft, Republican from Ohio. Teddy Roosevelt of New York, running as a third-party candidate on the Progressive Bull Moose Party.

Teddy Roosevelt had split the Republican Party in half and walked out and formed the Progressive Bull Moose Party. He had been president a few years earlier, but had declined to run again. He was unhappy with the way Taft was as president and unhappy with the Republican Party leadership of Taft.

Two things which held back Roosevelt and his third-party effort to win. (1) An attempt on TR’s life by an anarchist which today is nothing but a libertarian. In other words, libertarian / anarchists only believe in individual rights and don’t care about the lives of others. (2) The Electoral College.

TR was giving a speech when someone tried to gun him down. He felt it but continue his speech. He was a tough guy. They took him off to tend to his injury only to find he had an eye lens case in his chest pocket and it helped block the bullet. He was hospitalized for some time, but his hospitalization caused him to stop his whistle-stop train campaigning across the nation. This was problem for him as he attempted to win the election.

The second thing which stopped TR’s campaign to win the presidency was the existence of the Electoral College. For had there been no Electoral College and there had been, on the day the Electoral College would have met, a runoff election between the top two winners, Wilson and Roosevelt, would have happened instead. There are historical analysts who believe, had this happened, Roosevelt, the third-party candidate would have won in 1912. Mere speculation, but very possible it could have happened.

Susan Collins is a Republican more like TR than Howard Taft. Yet, all she want to do is not think about this situation and merely put a Band-Aid on a wound which is caused by the Electoral College and hope that it will solve the problem Reform, in the eyes of Susan Collins. It won’t solve the problem because it IS the problem and needs to be abolished.

I can say something like calling this woman a bitch. Or I can use the comedic words of Dan Akroyd of SNL when he would often be doing the “news” on SNL and turn to Jane Curtin and say, “Jane, you ignorant slut.” Perhaps these words would be more appropriate for this particular situation?

As a kid growing up in this rural area of upstate New York, we could drive and pick up local radio stations from Binghamton, Cortland, Ithaca, Owego, and other areas. It did not matter whether the stations were AM or FM. The exception might have been with WENE as they reduced their power at night. So, with AM radio, we could pick up WKBW out of Buffalo, WABC our of New York City, or WQXR (classical music) out of New York City. We could even received Wheeling, West Virginia AM late at night. Try to do any of this today.

What do we get today? Driving to Owego, NY, on NYS 38 and encounter the “mountains” (hills”) north of Owego and few of the stations come in. When I once drove to a job at IBM Federal Systems Division (today, Lockheed Martin), I never ever remember losing a local station by the hills to the east of NYS 38. Today, we do.

We had a large antenna at the top of our home (2 stories plus a large attic). With this antenna, we could pick up Binghamton AND Syracuse television stations. That was VHF. We could put up a special UHF antenna to pick up additional (besides VHF 12) Binghamton channels and Elmira channels. Try to do that today and I am told it is near impossible. So we are stuck with only one source. Spectrum “cable” TV and Internet. We experience buffering and often a connection with Spectrum which reminds me of the wait we had for a 1950s vacuum tube television to power up.

Due to the hills here, we were one of the first areas, along with those in the hills of Pennsylvania, to get wired for cable television. Now we were able to receive clearer pictures, particularly on the local UHF channels, but also with ABC channel 9 (VHF) out of Syracuse. What a thrill that was!

But we had a choice. Either use cable television or use, possibly upgrade, our own antennas. Here we are in the 21st Century and, due to the FCC, we don’t have choices. How much money rolls into the FCC from the big corporate conglomerates, in order to give us this centralized supply-side economics? Your guess is as good as mine.

In those years, the FCC utilized the Fairness Doctrine of the late 1940s bipartisan effort, to moderate what was on the air. The idea, too, was to not allow one ownership in a local area of ALL the media. Boy, has that changed today. This idea was a smart idea so that one company did not own it all. The ownership was spread around to others. Seems to me that Gannett owned one of the local Binghamton stations (today Fox 40, which was once WINR Television and broadcasting the NBC network). Today, Seem to remember that the rules changed and WINR had to be sold. The result was NBC WiCZ 40 and WINR Radio. All done to spread the ownership around, rather than allowing big centrally controlled supply-side economics companies to own an entire market, as what is allowed today.

OK. So, the power of local television and radio broadcasts is reduced. Got ya! Yes, so we can have the all thumbs approach to more mobile phones, the bandwidth for local television and radio had to be reduced. All thumbs and access to nothing but Internet, fake and false news. Destruction of local news outlets, whether newspapers with local INFORMATION (not just news) in detail. Plus, the loss of local television and radio by numerous owners who could vary what the public received in news and entertainment.

Oh, sure. Now we have channel 12, but also MeTV. We have My 8 (whatever that is). All these additional ones are on top of CBS, NBC, ABC. It’s nice because the PBS television can add extra channels for kids, create TV, and perhaps others.

But try to receive this myriad of stations and channels here in “country bumpkin” land of rural Tioga County. There might just be a clearer line, with less hills, to Elmira, Ithaca, and Syracuse. Yet, the distance and the weaker channels preclude us from receiving such. And the FCC says Spectrum cannot put the additional channels out for us to receive. Tough rules based on what the supply-side economics corporations want from the top of their “divine right” stools.”

How many other rural areas face this obstacle in America? I don’t remember rural areas being treated like chopped liver (or stools of shit) in those years gone by, just because we had a less dense population.

All thanks to the Internet and mobile phones. I can recall that Spectrum in Florida denied us mobile phones three times. Three times we mentioned we needed the phones delivered to us in South Florida. Three times, we received acknowledgement that, “oh, yeah, we understand you have not yet moved to Melbourne, so w will send to your South Florida address.” That in a state where people are so mobile.

Never happened. By the third strike, one got rather angry at being treated in such a lousy manner. And here we are. In upstate New York with Spectrum and no other choices for Internet.

Mobile phones and Internet are more important than local television, radio, and newspapers. How perverted will America get, beyond just what I have described? It is disgusting.

And all the digital technology has moved outside the USA, while President Biden and the Democrats would like to do something about such a situation, from infrastructure to regulatory concerns. And what do Republicans do? Sabotage President Biden and the Democrats.

I just have to say all this because it disgusts me with regard to local control we once had when IBM was here in the Southern Tier. Now, it all flies out the window.

And we live happily ever after.

Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet gave us supply side economics It was for the benefit of increasing salaries of fat pigs in the board rooms by over 1000%, busting unions and paying as little as possible to the people doing the work in this nation.

It was the idiot, Shrub, with words to validate supply-side economics, who said, at the turn of the Millennium, “what’s good for business is good for America.” Then with his political party gave us privatized Medicare in order to prop up supply side economics even further.

This was done while the Shrub and all those in Congress and in the government could get a lifetime benefit for healthcare which the rest of us “little people” don’t get, at least as good as those with “divine rights.” Remember, we are just “little people” and only numbers, not worth one damn except as chopped liver.

With this, then, we have this wonderful supply-side economics in the form of privatized Medicare.

When the glucose meter is working fine and is not broken, we face the “preferred” choice of supply-side privatized Medicare. The meter was not broken, so it did not need fixing. We, in America, often said, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” With supply-side economics, that is apparently no longer true. More like, if the big fat pig at the top can line his/her pockets by being paid off by manufacturers of meters (and other medical equipment), such as this one, we waste the money, whether the old one works or not. All for the sake of us “little people” in the senior citizens group.

No wonder we in America pay more for healthcare than those in Canada with their “socialized” system. We pay nearly twice as much asws our neighbors to the north. We pay and the big fat pigs line their pockets.

On top of it all, we in America have a lower longevity rate than our neighbors to the north with their “socialized” medicine. All for the big fat pigs with hedge funds and sitting at the heads of many corporations, on their damn fat asses like lazy bums in board rooms. While WE THE PEOPLE are treated like shit with this wasted money.

Let us give thanks to the demagogues with divine rights, such as charismatic Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet from long ago.

And we live happily ever after.

Dear Editors:

Feb. 20, 2022, The New York Times.

Susan Collins wants to reform the Electoral College? Why? Is she afraid if she runs for the presidency, only a popular vote being in place will means she would lose? Democrat Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election with the popular vote, but Republican Trump won the Electoral College vote. Susan Collins lives in fear that she would lose due to the demise and destruction of the Electoral College? And in her “bipartisan way” she is going to convince Democrats who have no confidence in themselves that they might live in fear at the loss of the Electoral College? it is like putting a Band-Aid on a deep wound which might need to be stitched back together and expecting the wound to heal, as the person with the wound bleeds to death.

Another reader in the newspaper, when reacting to David Brooks and his lainbrained ideas that we should have hope that evangelicals would come to their senses, said, Brooks is simply putting wallpaper over a problem. Having hung wallpaper myself, I found that if there was a lump of wallpaper paste, it simply got covered over, but it still existed. Just as with a wound which needs something more than a Band-Aid.

Americans are poor at remembering history in order to learn and move forward. There is no sense for what the Danish Kierkegaard said:

​In the 1850s, when the Republican Party was formed, we can learn from history regarding the Republicans, civil war, and the Dred Scott Decision. The Republican Party was formed from members of the Whig Party which was dying at that time. Many Whigs became disgusted with the work by George W. Bush’s maternal line ancestor who was president at the time, a Democrat, who nixed the compromise arranged regarding slavery. ​The bleeding heart Yankee liberals in the Supreme Court felt they needed to appease the South (i.e., Dixie white supremacists and forerunners to the KKK and Jim Crow ideas) by issuing a scathing attack of a black man in that SCOTUS decision. Politics and appeasing white people prevailed, not justice for human beings, as the SCOTUS is SUPPOSED to do.

Being in these situations today and considering Republican Senator Susan Collins with SCOTUS today, there is too much being done to “appease” the other side. That would include the words of David Brooks, too. Appeasing the South did not nothing to divert a civil war after Abraham Lincoln was elected. When will America learn before it implodes from within?  After all, we want to feel better about “turning the other cheek” to those who are lousy ones and insist on their dictatorial anti-human race ways. Considering friends like that who want to destroy democracy in America, who needs enemies?

With friends who are being “overly nice” to the other side so as to show empathy to hateful bigoted people, it is as if hatred and bigotry need to be recognized as protected by a U.S. Constitution. Such hateful people and bigots are confusing the population with ideas which have survived from  Reagan, a hateful Democrat turned Republican, that “government is the problem.” Translated. To the hateful and bigoted ones, government is only a problem when it regulates how Americans should treat one another and not have hatred and bigotry. Reaganomics with deregulation actually got extended to the notions of hatred and bigotry. How do I know? I was a member of the Republican Party at the time. I feel just like the former Whig Party members who decimated the party and began a new one. David Brooks, too, has no brains and knowledge of history on this one.

But Senator Collins? Reform the Electoral College? Senator Elizabeth Warren says (in my words), DESTROY the Electoral College. It has outlived its purposes when it was created during the time of only 13 colonies and it took quite some time to get the election results from New England to Georgia.  It is no longer needed and could be replaced by a hybrid system based on the parliamentary system in Britain (and Canada and other nations in the British Commonwealth which has a very brilliant constitutional monarchy with the royal family doing the ceremonial stuff that our president does with all the other duties of the president).  Get rid of the Electoral College, specify that, should no candidate win more than 50% of the popular vote, then the top two winners do a runoff election on the day when the Electoral College would normally meet.

Democracy takes participation and time, so I don’t accept the crap about trying to get voters registered and to get them out to vote. Don’t give me bullshit about the complexity of the situation, but solve the problem.

Let me just say that we can make excuses and any excuse will do.  Getting people involved in the democracy by voting and also working for issues and ideas for solutions is what takes to run a democracy. It takes a strong Middle Class, destroyed by big fat pigs who have seen an increase in salaries, since Reagan, of over 1000% while workers have seen a rather flattened increase over the same period and work too hard to have time for voting and elections. The Middle Class has been destroyed in this period of time, along with unions and worker rights.

Suggestion. Abolish the Electoral College. On presidential election days, close all bars and grills and make those a holiday. Consider that anyone objecting to this due to their false ideas that their “individual rights” have been violated are nothing but traitors to this nation. Sorry to be so tough and play so much hardball with this question. But it is true. 

Why do I suggest the above solution? Because in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, it just happens to mention “WE THE PEOPLE.”  It does not say, “Me, myself, and I, dictator Trump or DeSantis or Scott…” It does not specify any other INDIVIDUAL only.  It does not identify a god (demagogue) with divine rights which is made in the image of hateful and bigoted men and women (like David Brooks with his heart out to evangelicals). 

When will people like Brooks and Collins wake up and learn from history, before it is too late? When will bleeding heart Democrats learn from history?

Sometimes a Band-Aid is necessary for a wound. But the question about the Electoral College is a deep wound causing too much divisive rigor in this nation. It is so deep that we really need to work to eliminate it and not expect perfection with a blind eye towards hate and bigotry with no chance of SCOTUS justice being accomplished so as to maintain the balance with scales of justice. In this case, the scales of justice need to be heavily weighted on the side of humanitarian ideas of coexistence and not political ideology or preference of political party. In the 1850s, a political party was destroyed and it was not the Democrats which have evolved, over time, into a more humanitarian party. I saw many such white racist bigots in Dixie leave and join the Republicans, of which I was a member. I found them to be disgusting people who tried (and are still working hard at trying to balance to their dictatorial hateful side)  to balance the scales of justice towards their side of hatred. 

Is my writing too long? Too bad. It is important to say what needs to be said here and do so in detail. I apologize for the detail because I might just detain those who are two thumbs just reading fake news on mobile phones or the fake news on Fox / Fake News. Is there a vulgar word in the text, without a “bleep” to cover it over? Really? I am surprised.  Well. At least it was not the “f” word.

Inflation is in the news. Inflation has been in the news in the past years, so we all need to check our history. Inflation woes are being over-rated and put too much into the attention of the public so as to blame the Democrats. Wrong. Just check history.

In Florida, there were arrangements made to bolster big insurance. Floridians were to pick up the bills for hurricane coverage in homeowners’ insurance. In the process, there are estimates that, during those years, Floridians saw an INFLATIONARY increase of some 60% or so. Is this true? Seems as if those of us paying this saw it happen. So, now, we are to be complaining about a 7% (?) increase in prices?

With the insurance thing, all the companies moved at once with the same high prices, protected by those paying off our government legislators in Florida. At least with the 7% rise in inflation, with groceries, gasoline, and other products, the consumer does have a choice. You don’t want a meat priced at $10 per pound, then find a lower cost meat. WIth homeowners’ insurance, if I did not wish to pay the higher price, then find another one? NOT. The OTHER one did not exist. Furthermore, the money we put into the higher premiums went into some black hole, probably to pay the 1000% increases of CEO fat pig salaries during those years and there was a 0% return on investment. For me, myself, and I, I can say that, for my 40 plus years of investing in homeowners’ insurance, I have received zilch – nothing in return for all that money I have put in. No dividends. Nothing. Nada. Does anyone even care about the inflation with this product called homeowners’ insurance. Nah. No one cares. But we have to view and read in the media the BS about inflation right now, blaming the Democrats. I know for a fact it was primarily fat pig Republicans at the heads of those insurance corporations who were a large part of those on the receiving end of my premiums.

Then there is healthcare insurance. I worked on union negotiating teams as we tried to work to hold down the increases in healthcare insurance for our union members. Republicans on the other side of the table who were appointed by Republican Jeb Bush or Republican Rick the Prick Scott. Many of those guys were vicious and had no human cares at all, as they pushed healthcare increases upon the employees.

Now, being on Medicare and being on a lower revenue stream, I see increased costs far worse than the inflation to which the media and others lend microphones for people to complain.

Makes me wonder. How is it that these inflationary prices were missed when we had to experience them? Did they have no impact on the numbers figured for inflation? In other words, the 60% increase in homeowners’ insurance had negligible impact on inflation numbers? The increases in health insurance premiums PLUS healthcare costs had negligible impact on inflation? After all, we are reading and hearing that the numbers for inflation are the “highest in years.” Gosh. Where was I, on the planet Mars, when I experienced exponential increases in insurance premiums? Gosh. Silly me for complaining.

According to a recent newspaper article, Canadian senior citizens have a better longevity of life than American senior citizens. At the same time, healthcare costs in Canada are half of what they are in the USA> Canada has a single-payer universal healthcare system. The USA does not. The USA has Republicans, in order to get their way and destroy ideas for single-payer universal healthcare in the USA, lie through their teeth and get RINOs (and some Democrats, too) and others to believe them. After all, as Hitler’s Goebbels said, “if you tell a lie enough times, it eventually becomes the truth.” Trump and his followers work to destroy Obamacare. Bush says, “what’s good for business is good for America.”

Translated. What’s good for big insurance is good for America, even if it means some of us have experienced dumping money which SHOULD BE capitalist investments, into homeowners’ insurance at very high rates in the Florida of DeSantis and Rick the Prick Scott and many years into big health insurance, only be told that when we don’t have such coverage, we have to pay out of pocket for “pre-existing conditions.”

The end result is that we line the pockets of big fat cats in business, pay twice as much as in the Canadian system, and have a lower life expectancy than what the Canadians have. Am I being cynical or what? Silly me.

Dear Editors:

Headline: Virginia Republicans wish to Tighten Marijuana Laws.

Headlines: Trump Convinces Americans to Build a Wall in Order to Protect us from Influence of Drug Lords.

Headlines: Trump Creates Time Line for Withdrawal from Afghanistan. New President (Biden) Follows Through with Plans for Withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Comment on last headline. What did Trump do to establish peace AND justice in Afghanistan? The timeline was about peace, but nothing about justice, was it? What did Trump do to stop the drug lords in Afghanistan regarding the opium trade? Does silence grow like a cancer so as to cover over drug lords and their business interests, both in the USA and in Afghanistan? Are people afraid to do anything about these issues, for fear of their lives? Is the “wall” a cover-up for the sake of American drug lord business interests?

Are marijuana laws being protected by keeping the substance illegal? Is this why we hear people being encouraged to resist the freedom of making marijuana legal? This is not only a question in Virginia, but also among Republicans in New York and other areas, too.

Fact. Illegal drugs are good for business for many people who wish to keep the silence about it going, due to an interest in covering it all up. By doing so, such people make more money than if the products were legal.

Fact. There were people who made more money when alcohol was illegal. America had to put up with guns and violence in the process, so such people could make more money illegally by silencing competitors and those who wanted to reveal what was happening.

Fact. It was Republicans and one particular Republican leader who always said, “what’ s good for business is good for America.” Anybody put these facts together and figure out how drugs, guns, and violence is spurred on by “business” and that is “good for America?”

The answer, in order to divert attention from the hidden agenda of the drug lords of America, is to use taxpayer dollars from the common folk (because the wealthy drug lords probably don’t want to pay taxes) build a wall. And this is good for business in America and also good for America?

And what is the result for us when we speak up? Consider whether we need to protect our life or death situations? After all, we ever thinks and speaks like Nathan Hale any more, unless it is to protect guns, violence and secretive illegal drug cartels?

Shall We Discuss Infation?

Dear Editors:

Once again, I praise your newspaper for providing informative sections of the newspaper, from business to arts, culture, health, and overall op-eds not based on one political ideology. Please open up shop in Binghamton in order to compete with Gannett which is negligent in its duty in providing adequate news, information, and thinking puzzles on paper. Open up shop in order to provide the capitalist competition in GOOD journalism, not the inadequate in sensationalist, emotional, shallow entertainment which appeals only to those without a willingness to learn new things in lifelong learning of America.

As I have said for many years and not I reiterate. we need to move forward by learning from the past.

​Inflation. ​At its worse in many years.

Here is another angle based on what has happened in business and commerce cycles of the past. Historical. There have always been cycles of inflation, recession, and economic depression. What else is new? What is the stuff of snotty young bratty ones with big mouths complaining about this one right now? Is it all being led by Republican fascists who hate Democrats, so they grab at anything which smacks of Democrats, ignoring what has happened in the past.

We read that with the inflation is lower unemployment and higher wages. OMG. Since the last huge inflationary period, during the years of Reagan, CEO salaries have jumped by over 1000%. The common folk have experienced some unbelievable increases in prices, but no inflation? Sure At the same time, the common folk have been forced into flat wages and salaries, while their benefits and salaries have been STOLEN from them by big fat pigs whose incomes have gone up by 1000% over 40 years or more. Now, the crying and moaning by the big fat pigs is an attack against Democrats because now they have to dig into their pockets and pay more for labor. Good gosh. So, these fat pigs simply complain about making prices higher and still refuse to dig deep to pay government taxes and labor more money. Oh, boo hoo!  I feel so sorry for these fat pigs. I feel so sorry for the fat pigs called the Koch brothers and the Manchin they own in West Virginia.   What’s the song, “so sorry…. so sorry…” Country western one, is it not?

What about those of us who are retired and putting up with lousy private insurance companies and a Medicare put in place by Congress and government people who have their health benefits, for life, handed to them on a silver platter?

Does this mean, “government is a problem?” Or does it mean, “government needs to be reformed in various ways, including stopping the lobbyists in Congress, making PACs illegal, and using only government funding of campaigns? WOW!  GEE! Did America not have this scenario at one time, but it was replaced slowly by wealthy fat pigs and their control without justice being done of Congress and the Supreme Court? Like Citizens United?  Reform, not destroy. Put teeth in the reforms, but not to destroy, as Trump, DeSantis, Rick the Prick and other fascist wealthy Republicans wish to do so as to protect the wealthy fat pigs who love money over people.

Hike in gasoline prices? Hmmmmmmmm…..   That never happened before, did it? Stay tuned. It was brought to us in the early 1970s by the same people who, today, prop up opium sellers and executions in the barbaric style in Afghanistan. Did Trump ever stop those people in Afghanistan? Not on your life. One has to ask WHY NOT? 

At any  rate, as I graduated high school and began college, we experienced long lines at the gas pumps and high prices. All brought on by our favorite Arab freaks and creeps who work to prop up lousy fascist regimes run by the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS. 
Wait just one minute!  Did not it happen under the watch of DEMOCRATS who were COMMANDER IN CHIEF?  Obama and bringing down Bin Laden. Did Bush do it? NAH. Biden and a leader of ISIS recently brought down. Did Trump do it? Yet, big loudmouths, paid by big fat pigs, bloviate about how bad these Democrats were / are as commander in chief? I wonder why that is? Or is this done because of a WEDGE ISSUE for which the Republican fascists wish to use to divide America? Need I go into details? OK. I guess I need to keep it short. Forget going into detail so no one can LEARN as they should by seeking wisdom, not certainty.

​In the early 1970s, with the looming oil embargo and rise in prices of gasoline, did Americans bitch and moan and complain about our government, based on the lousy attitude of Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet? Oh, no. Because Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet had not yet become president! Oh!  That’s it!  We had not yet experienced the finesse and charisma of Sleepy Ronnie in the Cabinet and the destruction of the Fairness Doctrine in the Media!  THAT MUST BE THE CONCLUSION TO DRAW, RIGHT?​  I am so sick and tired about what America is experiencing today that I just cannot shut up and bring these peripheral things into the discussion, can I? Silly and foolish me, for sure.

I recall the number of times we students at a SUNY school car pooled going back and forth about four hours from the Southern Tier of Upstate New York. We learned t adjust. Car pooling became quite popular in those years. AH! But perhaps we were being directed by more reasonable and common sense people in the population, rather than the lousy perverted snotty bratty immature ones who think only about me, myself, and I. How dare we car pool and do things together for the sake of America. It is so damn disturbing to disrupt individual rights, right? (GD the Virginia governor for bloviating about Individual rights; Don’t put on that GD mask or get vaccinated because you will disrupt individual rights and fight a war against a virus, just as we fought a war against an oil embargo).

When prices increased, as they are now, what did we do? We used capitalism to its advantage. We used the U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (Trump wishes to destroy it) to enable us to get lower-priced items. With this, we have a mailbox, not dependent on some truck being able to open our garage door. GD that idea and invasion of our privacy!  BUT WAIT A MINUTE!  I thought these people who wish to destroy the USPS think that our privacy is being invaded by the conspiracy of a chip planted within a vaccine!  Some consistency, wouldn’t you say? Generated by immature bastards who lack intelligence and common sense. 

We were able to figure out whether it was best to drive extra miles to obtain a lower-cost gasoline or wait until we are visiting the area and doing other chores. We were intelligent and had enough common sense to know that it makes no sense just to drive to a place where gasoline was available and at a lower price and to plan accordingly. Car pooling helped. Using bikes helped. GEE! Even walking helped.  And dare I mention how much public transit helped? Those going to upstate for college no longer had the trains, so they rode Greyhound or Trailways. Oh, that’s right!  The fat pigs work to destroy buses and trains!  Silly me for forgetting that! 

Circulars in newspapers, sometimes free in a Pennysaver, gave us information about food. Today, we are forced to PAY for technology in order to see crap with a lousy search engines called Google.  But the newspapers for which we paid gave us a large amount of content, unlike what they do today, in many cases like Gannett in Binghamton, Ithaca, Melbourne, FL, West Palm Beach, FL, and many other areas. Change to technology for the sake of change and then complain about when inflation happens.  Go ahead, you foolish fools. 

If I want to make a meal with short ribs, I go to the store. OMG!  The price of short ribs, $10.00 per pound!  I MUST HAVE those for my WANTS not my NEEDS, according to shallow people who lack common sense. No. If the price is too high, I can adjust because there are many other options than to pay $10 per pound for short ribs.  I look for the cheaper meats, seafood, and foods. If I cannot find such, which I have yet to find this situation, maybe I will end up like my mom and dad, along with my grandparents, who had products rationed during the Great Depression and then during World War II.

​Have I made any sense here? Have I made my point in this discussion. If not, then shame on you.